Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille, on 2020-07-23 14:43:18 +0200: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:48:24PM +0200, etienne.mollier@mailoo.org wrote: > > Even though the case for Csh has just been sorted, > > I confirm that I did not intended to blame csh maintainers beeing lazy. > The issues are usually set quickly. Its just that the inbox of > subscribers of the Debian Med developers list is flooded by 20+x mails > from time to time with an issue we neither can nor need to respond to. > This creates unnecessary noise which might cause loosing relevant > information. I've actually now removed all my "removal from testing > warnings" of today and check BTS what really needs my attention. I actually have a bit of a decade old history with Csh, hence my having stronger feelings about it than usual perhaps. But no worries, I didn't intend to put any blame of any sort on anyone neither. > > I happily > > volunteer to have a look at mummer, or any other package > > depending on Csh, to not depend on it anymore. I can begin to > > have a look at it this evening. > > Mummer is specifically hard since it has several reverse depends which > are all affected by that false alarm. We have probably other packages > but its bearable to get say 2-3 false warnings rather than a whole page > in my mutt view. > > Thanks a lot for considering to work on this Let's see what I agreed to... :) Kind Regards, -- Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org> Old rsa/3072: 5ab1 4edf 63bb ccff 8b54 2fa9 59da 56fe fff3 882d New rsa/4096: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da Sent from /dev/tty1, please excuse my verbosity.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature