[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libbarclay-java needs update, libpicard-java runtime tests by pigx-scrnaseq



Hi,

Le 10/09/2020 à 17:11, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi Steffen,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 03:32:49PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
>> libpicard-java needs an argparse class from the barclay library. This
>> was found by the intense build-time testing of the PIGx-scRNAseq.
>>  ...
>> How shall I/we proceed? My immediate plan was to just update locally to
>> vesion 4.0.0 (released a few days ago) and see if the two reverse
>> dependencies still build.
> 
> From my naive point of view the migration to a recent libbarclay-java
> should be easy given that only two packages in our hands are rdepends
> of it.  Thus I was running routine-update on barclay[1] but the build
> is running into:
> 
> ...
> radle Test Executor 1 finished executing tests.
> Results: FAILURE (346 tests, 344 successes, 2 failures, 0 skipped)
> 
> 
> Pierre, can you help? ;-)
>

I have had a really hard time, but I finally found the issue (a
LinkedHashMap was wrongly iterated over in a Freemarker template), now
all build tests are passing and the .deb can be built :-)
I have pushed my changes to Salsa.

Could someone do some final checks (maybe forward the patch I have written)?

> 
>> If this update then then happens to also fix
>> the failed test of PIGx-scRNAseq, then this shall be it. Alternatively,
>> well, we would need versioned library packages, then, and I'll see how
>> far version 3 carries me.
> 
> I do not think we should spent time on a version that just became
> outdated so version 4 should most probably be our target.
> 
>> Right? If there is anyone out there who is a
>> bit closer to the barclay library, please direct me if there is any need
>> to keep the older version 2 in the archive.
> 
> Libpicard-java needs an update as well - so I'd suggest to upgrade
> libbarclay-java first and than see how to continue (may be together
> with upstream).
> 
> Disclaimer:  All I said is probably absolutely naive and not based on
> any deeper knowledge about the software involved simply guided by my gut
> feeling about what usually was a sensible strategy.
>

I do not know barclay either but I would say the same.

> 
> Kind regards
> 
>        Andreas.
> 
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/barclay 
> 

Best regards,
Pierre


Reply to: