Re: libbarclay-java needs update, libpicard-java runtime tests by pigx-scrnaseq
Hi Steffen,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 03:32:49PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> libpicard-java needs an argparse class from the barclay library. This
> was found by the intense build-time testing of the PIGx-scRNAseq.
> ...
> How shall I/we proceed? My immediate plan was to just update locally to
> vesion 4.0.0 (released a few days ago) and see if the two reverse
> dependencies still build.
>From my naive point of view the migration to a recent libbarclay-java
should be easy given that only two packages in our hands are rdepends
of it. Thus I was running routine-update on barclay[1] but the build
is running into:
...
radle Test Executor 1 finished executing tests.
Results: FAILURE (346 tests, 344 successes, 2 failures, 0 skipped)
Pierre, can you help? ;-)
> If this update then then happens to also fix
> the failed test of PIGx-scRNAseq, then this shall be it. Alternatively,
> well, we would need versioned library packages, then, and I'll see how
> far version 3 carries me.
I do not think we should spent time on a version that just became
outdated so version 4 should most probably be our target.
> Right? If there is anyone out there who is a
> bit closer to the barclay library, please direct me if there is any need
> to keep the older version 2 in the archive.
Libpicard-java needs an update as well - so I'd suggest to upgrade
libbarclay-java first and than see how to continue (may be together
with upstream).
Disclaimer: All I said is probably absolutely naive and not based on
any deeper knowledge about the software involved simply guided by my gut
feeling about what usually was a sensible strategy.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/barclay
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: