Re: Help for testing iitii needed

[Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>]

Hi Aaron,

thanks a lot for your analysis.

On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 10:18:30AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> 
> I'd initially thought I was looking at a single cascade of errors, but
> there turned out to be three separate problems here:
> 
> - Wrong CTPL, now addressed.

:-)
 
> - References to iit<...> and iitii<...> without explicit iitii::
>   namespace prefixes, easy to address formally.

Could you commit a patch since my C++ knowledge is extremely
limited (even if I have a vague feeling what you mean).

> - More fundamentally, a builder type mismatch -- iit<...> and iitii<...>
>   are specifically geared to work with iit_mm_builder_base<...>, which
>   requires the name of a backing file to use as its first argument,
>   whereas the test code (and the header's comments) appear to assume
>   plain iit_builder_base<...>, which takes no such argument.

I do not even have a feeling what you mean. :-(

Thanks again

       Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de