Re: Help for testing iitii needed

[ucko@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko)]

Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> writes:

> Sorry, my fault.  Pushed now.

Thanks!

I'd initially thought I was looking at a single cascade of errors, but
there turned out to be three separate problems here:

- Wrong CTPL, now addressed.

- References to iit<...> and iitii<...> without explicit iitii::
  namespace prefixes, easy to address formally.

- More fundamentally, a builder type mismatch -- iit<...> and iitii<...>
  are specifically geared to work with iit_mm_builder_base<...>, which
  requires the name of a backing file to use as its first argument,
  whereas the test code (and the header's comments) appear to assume
  plain iit_builder_base<...>, which takes no such argument.

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?amu@monk.mit.edu