[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS paml - fixed #957659

Hi Andreas,

Andreas Tille, on 2020-05-09 15:01:33 +0200:
> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 02:27:37PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> > I fixed another Gcc-10 FTBFS, for the "paml" package this time,
> > and took this opportunity to run routine-update.
> Thanks a lot.

You're welcome, thanks for the upload.

> > I have not forwarded the patch for the moment, since reporting
> > bugs requires posting in a Google Group that forbids contact
> > through email, and I have no Google account for the moment, at
> > least none usable to my knowledge.  :(
> IMHO if upstream makes it very hard to be contacted our effort
> we should do should not be exagerated.

I'm not entirely sure I understood your opinion, but if there
are more projects requiring a Google Account to contact
upstream, then I'll probably reconsider getting one.

After all, there are so many projects on Github today, that I
ended up opening an account last month just to allow myself
interacting with upstream.  It seems to have been a good move
given the positive reactions I received on that side so far.  :)

Kind Regards,
Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org>
Fingerprint:  5ab1 4edf 63bb ccff 8b54  2fa9 59da 56fe fff3 882d
Help find cures against the Covid-19 !  Give CPU cycles:
  * Rosetta@home: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/
  * Folding@home: https://foldingathome.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: