Re: RFS paml - fixed #957659
Hi Étienne,
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 02:27:37PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> I fixed another Gcc-10 FTBFS, for the "paml" package this time,
> and took this opportunity to run routine-update.
Thanks a lot.
> Manual pages
> are still missing though. Actually, I have no clue how are
> supposed to be used these programs, so it may be better if
> someone having little background in phylogenic analysis has a
> look at this.
I tend to use help2man but as you might have noticed this does
not work here.
> I have not forwarded the patch for the moment, since reporting
> bugs requires posting in a Google Group that forbids contact
> through email, and I have no Google account for the moment, at
> least none usable to my knowledge. :(
IMHO if upstream makes it very hard to be contacted our effort
we should do should not be exagerated.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: