Hi William and Tony,
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 03:22:01PM +0100, William McCaffery wrote:
> That sounds reasonable, especially if we want to keep them as discreet
> projects. If Andreas would be willing to set this up that would be great.
Please have a look at
https://salsa.debian.org/blends-team/biolinux
To have some content I have choosen a copy of med-bio for biolinux-desktop
and med-bio-dev for biolinux-server which is definitely *not* sensible, but
works as a test case. Please adapt the tasks (including the Description in
the top) to your preference. Once you have something reasonable I'll setup
the websentinel config to have tasks pages for BioLinux.
> As far as I can tell from the Debian documentation and what we've discussed,
> the complete set of Bio-Linux tasks would simply be Tim's original package
> list, divided into desktop and server tasks. I would ask your preference on
> whether we would use the reduced list I created which only has packages in
> sid (although this has some issues with virtual packages) or the compete
> set. I know that the documentation states the latter, but I don't know if
> all of the packages are still useful to Bio-Linux. As for separating
> Bio-Linux server and client packages, I can go through Tim's packages and
> try and create a list of packages for a server task for review.
Please check all files for spelling issues etc. There is no point in
manually editing debian/control or biolinux-tasks.desc since these are
autogenerated. You get them by
make dist
Hope this helps over the first hurdle but keep on asking here. I'll be
more responsive soon (just in the train back home from DebConf).
Thanks for the effort to merge BioLinux and Debian Med - I'm positive
about a great and productive cooperation
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de