Re: picard-tools updated, and ready?
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 03:14:29PM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> On 05/24/2018 08:35 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi Olivier,
> >>>> I can't upload to unstable as one of the deps (gkl) depends on htsjdk ,
> >>>> and need a *recent* one (the one in experimental works, the one in sid
> >>>> fails).
> >>>> So to upload those picard-tools deps, we first need to put htsjdk in sid
> >>> If this is needed we might go for it and file a fake RC bug so people
> >>> can fall back to the version in testing.
> >> What do you think about this? Do we want to upload htsjdk to unstable?
> > I've uploaded to unstable now. Hope the currently quiete slow new processing
> > will speed up again soon for the dependencies. :-)
> will you create a RC bug to prevent testing migration?
I can do - however, I'm afraid this will not help htsjdk in testing since
bug #877590 remains unfixed there.
So what do you think, will be the best thing to do?