Re: NETTAB 2016 abstract deadline extended to June 30th
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *De: *"Michael Crusoe" <michael.crusoe@gmail.com>
> *À: *"Debian Med Project List" <debian-med@lists.debian.org>
> *Envoyé: *Mercredi 8 Juin 2016 14:58:34
> *Objet: *NETTAB 2016 abstract deadline extended to June 30th
>
> Solicited topics http://www.igst.it/nettab/2016/submissions/topics/
>
> I think a presentation on what Debian (Med) has to offer the
> community would be well received and I would be happy to co-author
> or advise such an abstract.
>
> I plan to submit something there (not Debian related) , if accepted,
> it would be nice to meet there ;-)
We should think of writing up all those latest developments. I like the
Nettab, the hackathon, sprints, codefest paper had its origin right
there. I am very much up to it, we just need to ensure that this does
not block us from publishing somewhere more visibly, like a Nature
Scientific Report or some more free flavor of it. Seriously, continuous
modesty wrt impact factors is nice but not helpful.
>
>
> The COST mechanism is also interesting: could fund a four year
> project with support for sprints and trainings on community
> software maintenance.
>
> http://www.cost.eu/COST_Actions
>
> We would need collaboration between five COST countries (basically
> Europe), financial support averages EUR 130 000 per year for a
> four-year period (though it is all for meeting support, no
> salaries or direct research support).
>
> I think we need to be affiliated to research institute and research
> programs .... I don't think it would work for Debian.
Oh, we are all employed somewhere. It would work. I am in cHiPSeT
(http://chipset-cost.eu/, anybody finding me on that picture gets a free
drink at our next Sprint). Just, if I was the EU I would say that we are
already doing what the EU wants us to get into - a trusting
international collaboration, so I would not give us any money since we
are too good already. But we should try. Caveat: These meetings take
time. Sending students around and training them takes time. Writing
reports does. All this time needs to help your main job in some way,
otherwise you are in trouble. The COST would hence not necessarily have
"Debian" in its name but of course we should think about that instrument.
Steffen
Reply to: