I don't mind anything like that. Our goal is done our work well so i'll look your list and choose packages with considering conflictions.
Sure, that's fine.
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 06:32:47AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 01:59:14AM +0300, merlettaia wrote:
> > > Please note that emboss is probably not a good thing to start with since
> > > its quite complex.
> > >
> > > > pymol | 608 |
> > > > rasmol | 319 |
> > >
> > > These both are maintained by the DebiChem team which is no reason to
> > > stop us to enhance packages of cooperating teams but as far as I know
> > > the packages need upstream upgrades as well which might cause problems.
> > > Fixing those problems would be definitely very welcome (I think Tanya
> > > announced that she wants to work on one of these).
> > >
> > Yes :-) If you don't mind I would work on these two packages, or at least
> > pymol
> Not mind is the wrong word. I'd be really happy if we would get these
> two packages updated to the latest upstream version. Michael, would you
> mind if I migrate pymol from SVN to Git since Tanya is more comfortable
> with this.
What's her alioth username?
> It might also help if you would add her to the DebiChem team
> to enable her direct commit permissions.