Hi, Canberk and Andreas!
20.05.2016 11:29 пользователь "Andreas Tille" <email@example.com> написал:
> Hi Canberk,
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 04:04:08AM +0300, Canberk Koç wrote:
> > Hello Andreas,
> > I execute script succesfully and have a list at last thank you :-) I look
> > them and consider i start with most voted to the last like this list . And
> > i'll talk with Tanya to avoid confliction.
> Fine. This was the sense of the list. :-)
> > emboss | 753 |
> Please note that emboss is probably not a good thing to start with since
> its quite complex.
> > pymol | 608 |
> > rasmol | 319 |
> These both are maintained by the DebiChem team which is no reason to
> stop us to enhance packages of cooperating teams but as far as I know
> the packages need upstream upgrades as well which might cause problems.
> Fixing those problems would be definitely very welcome (I think Tanya
> announced that she wants to work on one of these).
Yes :-) If you don't mind I would work on these two packages, or at least pymol
> > clustalx | 162 |
> > ncbi-tools6 | 154 |
> > perlprimer | 144 |
> > njplot | 141 |
> > treeviewx | 109 |
> > ncbi-blast+ | 81 |
> > gbrowse | 80 |
> You might like to pick those from the list that you know to some extend
> first. There is no point in sticking to the sequence strictly.
> > But first i complete exonerate package i remember it have some
> > problems about test.
> Its fine if you intend to enhance it. I recently uploaded exonerate
> with the existing test which at least is passing.
> > My finals will start 30 May also how many package i must complete in a
> > week to complete my task succesfuly what do you think
> I admit that I have no realistic estimation for the number of packages
> you can finally manage. There might be packages where it is very simple
> and with some experience in working on this in the end of the project it
> sounds possible to do one package per day if it are easy ones. But I do
> not intend to make this a fixed number since I evaluate a well designed
> test for an important package higher than just a simple tickmark behind
> any package of the list. If I see that you are busy working on those
> packages and we get a third of the whole list done that's fine - if we
> manage more that's better. Defining "success" is also a long term goal.
> I'd consider it success as well if you might keep on working inside the
> team after the GSoC project has finished.
> Kind regards