Re: transitions and binnmu
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 04:52:18PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 04:07:40PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> > > Actually, I just saw that packages like amide and aeskulap were
> > > already
> > > build against the latest dcmtk.
> > >
> > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-dcmtk.html
> > Ah, right, excellent.
> > For what it is worth, I would consider a Request for Removal
> > for ginkgocadx which might help getting things unblocked
> > earlier.
> I_m not quite sure, but I think packages that are not in testing don't
> block the transition, which means insighttoolkit4 is the only package
> that is not yet build against the latest dcmtk that is already in
> With #808491 insighttoolkit4 now has an RC bug that will either be
> fixed soon (hopefully, but this likely depends on upstream) or forces
> its removal from testing. Either way we should get the dcmtk side of
> things into testing in a few weeks.
Looks like it.
GinkgoCADx, however, is also involved in transitions like
GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346