Luis -- It might be helpful if you looked at one of my VistA SemiVivA packages (for an example, go to https://sourceforge.net/projects/worldvista-ehr/files/WorldVistA%20EHR%20_VOE%201.0/WorldVistA%20EHR%20_VOE%201.0%20Release%206-2008/ - shortcut at http://tinyurl.com/lgq32vh - look at the readme and download the release WorldVistAEHRVOE10Release6-08SemiVivA.tgz.nc from that page). Installing VistA on a system is not like, say, installing an office suite where everyone runs the same software, or installing a web server, where one web server can serve all domains from that machine. It's not even like a database engine, where you can create multiple database environments which the installed engine runs. Instead, an installed VistA on a system is a source environment from which to build working environments, which are incrementally customized in both routines and state. This is what a SemiVivA attempts to do. From the installed environment, a script (which is called "install") creates a working environment, and also can create sub-environments off working environments, e.g,. for development and testing. A SemiVivA includes a bundled GT.M. That of course a VistA Debian package would not have. Instead, it would depend on an fis-gtm meta-package, which would be satisfied by the package of any GT.M release. Regards -- Bhaskar In my opinion, VistA should be packaged as a collection of .m source files, and On 12/29/2013 06:31 PM (US Eastern
Time), Luis Ibanez wrote:
-- GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast. Secure. No compromises.
_____________
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. |