Re: [MoM] ProbABEL packaging
Hi Lennart,
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 04:05:36PM +0100, L.C. Karssen wrote:
> > since your last commit probabel builds for me nicely. I think this is a
> > good point in time to create a WNPP bug (using reportbug wnpp).
>
> That's good news! I'll do that probably later today.
:-)
> > There is also the warning about
> >
> > arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 11103kB 91%
> >
> > After having a look into /usr/share/probabel/examples and
> > /usr/share/probabel/tests I think we can clearly see where this comes
> > from. I would split up these both directories into a separate
> > `Architecture: all` package. If the directories might be needed for day
> > to day work these should go into probabel-data and probabel should
> > depend from this package.
>
> I think it is best to get rid of the tests directory. These are only
> used when running make check, so not interesting for the end user.
OK.
> The
> data in the examples directory is of interest to the user. If removing
> tests is enough, I'll leave it at that. Otherwise I'll try to make a
> separate probabel-example package.
I'd recommend a separate examples package since it is in principle quite
easy to create (we have *lots* of examples in Vcs) and there are several
advantages to split this from the main program (if you might be curious
about these examples I could give a short list).
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: