Re: QIIME 1.7 - any users in debian-testing/unstable ?
[Sorry for my last empty mail ...]
Hi
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:50:10AM +0100, Simon Kainz wrote:
> Wel, yes please, i woulde really appreciate that.
> I would prefer git over svn.
>
> My current work is available here:
> http://www.familiekainz.at/projekte/linux/rtax/rtax-0.984-all.tgz
I turned this into
ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/rtax.git
which you can checkout. Please `git log` to visit my changes.
> I hopefully made it Debian-Med policy compliant.
As I said I did some changes.
> I don't want to drop work on you, but yes, please help me getting
> starting with this the right way.
The workload was OK given your preparation. I guess you do not mind
that I just sponsored the package.
Regarding qiime: I was tunning all_tests again and I wonder why Steffen
thinks rtax might have any influence on this test. The installed
package did neither good nor bad for the test - it simply had the same
result and rtax was not mentioned in any of the logs except in the form
cogent/app/rtax.py
... but that's python-cogent and not rtax.
Steffen, please be a bit more verbose about what you think might be
helpful for a better qiime support.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: