[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: QIIME 1.7 - any users in debian-testing/unstable ?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 2013-11-27 14:27, schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Hi Steffen,
> 
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 01:33:32PM +0100, "Steffen Möller" wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> qiime in stable is (expectedly) outdated with version 1.4. Now, I
>> had my colleague using the Debian package of 1.7 rather than
>> installing it all by himself, but, well, all_tests.py fails
>> miserably.
> 
>> We quickly hacked the missing packages for rtax
> 
> Simon ITPed rtax #724280 and he claimed that the package is close
> to be finished.  Simon, if it might speed up things I'd volunteer
> to create the according Vcs repository (please tell me your
> preference between Git and SVN).  In case you might consider this
> helpful just provide the needed stuff somewhere online.  As you see
> there are testers waiting for it.

Hello!

Wel, yes please, i woulde really appreciate that.
I would prefer git over svn.

My current work is available here:
http://www.familiekainz.at/projekte/linux/rtax/rtax-0.984-all.tgz

This includes the upstream source and my work so far. d
ebuild -uc -us  runs fine.


I removed the VCS-Entries from the control file, as i'm currently not
sure what the vcs location is.

I hopefully made it Debian-Med policy compliant.

I don't want to drop work on you, but yes, please help me getting
starting with this the right way.

Thank you very much.

Simon



> 
>> and qcli together, installed R packages I never heard of before,
>> and then ... well ... decided to just experiment with the
>> virtualbox image that upstream provides.
>> 
>> We need to do something to improve our users' experience. I know
>> Tim to care for the package. Who else? Among our users anyone?
> 
> Well, you know how this magical "we" works. :-)  Make a proper list
> what needs to be done
> 
> - rtax: #724280 - qcli: what homepage, did you startet some
> packaging - "R packages I never heard of before": we neither have
> heard about these - you at least are knowing the names
> 
> Than we might tackle your list step by step - the more you can 
> personally do the faster we will finish your list and can fullfill 
> your requirement.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Andreas.
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=A7w8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: