Re: QIIME 1.7 - any users in debian-testing/unstable ?
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:50:10AM +0100, Simon Kainz wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am 2013-11-27 14:27, schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > Hi Steffen,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 01:33:32PM +0100, "Steffen Möller" wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> qiime in stable is (expectedly) outdated with version 1.4. Now, I
> >> had my colleague using the Debian package of 1.7 rather than
> >> installing it all by himself, but, well, all_tests.py fails
> >> miserably.
> >
> >> We quickly hacked the missing packages for rtax
> >
> > Simon ITPed rtax #724280 and he claimed that the package is close
> > to be finished. Simon, if it might speed up things I'd volunteer
> > to create the according Vcs repository (please tell me your
> > preference between Git and SVN). In case you might consider this
> > helpful just provide the needed stuff somewhere online. As you see
> > there are testers waiting for it.
>
> Hello!
>
> Wel, yes please, i woulde really appreciate that.
> I would prefer git over svn.
>
> My current work is available here:
> http://www.familiekainz.at/projekte/linux/rtax/rtax-0.984-all.tgz
>
> This includes the upstream source and my work so far. d
> ebuild -uc -us runs fine.
>
>
> I removed the VCS-Entries from the control file, as i'm currently not
> sure what the vcs location is.
>
> I hopefully made it Debian-Med policy compliant.
>
> I don't want to drop work on you, but yes, please help me getting
> starting with this the right way.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Simon
>
>
>
> >
> >> and qcli together, installed R packages I never heard of before,
> >> and then ... well ... decided to just experiment with the
> >> virtualbox image that upstream provides.
> >>
> >> We need to do something to improve our users' experience. I know
> >> Tim to care for the package. Who else? Among our users anyone?
> >
> > Well, you know how this magical "we" works. :-) Make a proper list
> > what needs to be done
> >
> > - rtax: #724280 - qcli: what homepage, did you startet some
> > packaging - "R packages I never heard of before": we neither have
> > heard about these - you at least are knowing the names
> >
> > Than we might tackle your list step by step - the more you can
> > personally do the faster we will finish your list and can fullfill
> > your requirement.
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> > Andreas.
> >
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSlwO8AAoJEBy08PeN7K/pXMwP/0nk5T/PjtrMSuuumaNsAO3T
> guu5wvwLuLyFYRowj0c6UtNyKJPspwLjltecpuraGwpDyob0lJE834Au0xCvG/d5
> Gghc97bPZvJ9Lo+cAhc+k5heeBp5Toe+1ui1ZMx/OLVtPg/UdXHXchwotJOJngkb
> Z7vIgLVlCsVnnI34w8OQnFDsw7kh1V35xUxwnVCWKeLoWibGhnmOIVlca7rBtQAi
> bpJ3rkfTCvFztYbMn6q5+7aI1qQYLTOkvbX/GwApPaTGEEh+FslmcCkHRWR7L9jO
> ApWjjCmi+2ROKYzl7akmMIIu5zrJv0eFDQEfd4A0hY0Iu3xjrL1UOoH49IH2sQnk
> 2/K1+pXlhc0b3fpA0lHMzX+5bKpnKElP7paY/7Q0erotgRgDA60Smo21S/zF7NSM
> fWuGo1eqKKk73k/Ro0YdL4d7UV6iPGPIuBkUnmLHXMONFkfRCuu9GFeYxuTbhxbX
> 9UoyODu/2mzsy837YybZX1dBPDmoZr7E6wWM/15Aw8FlL+G2WL2RrolD1fwt9WAw
> 37Sp4FTYnSapXoKJshNx+YmDHvz4xGb71S5md0QY+gvaHkjmwv6DHrnx4rTQN5fW
> Q8XD8wKetxCYIFTF/ScTXudZxel++gyRCdvymWuriUeAV+15MqPLlv+V38wmGwhs
> ysY9G461c5768edQUtI1
> =A7w8
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: