Re: QIIME 1.7 - any users in debian-testing/unstable ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am 2013-11-28 13:39, schrieb Andreas Tille:
> [Sorry for my last empty mail ...] Hi
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:50:10AM +0100, Simon Kainz wrote:
>> Wel, yes please, i woulde really appreciate that. I would prefer
>> git over svn.
>>
>> My current work is available here:
>> http://www.familiekainz.at/projekte/linux/rtax/rtax-0.984-all.tgz
>
>>
> I turned this into
>
> ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/rtax.git
>
> which you can checkout. Please `git log` to visit my changes.
>
>> I hopefully made it Debian-Med policy compliant.
>
> As I said I did some changes.
>
>> I don't want to drop work on you, but yes, please help me
>> getting starting with this the right way.
>
> The workload was OK given your preparation. I guess you do not
> mind that I just sponsored the package.
WOW, thank you! Thank you very much.
>
> Regarding qiime: I was tunning all_tests again and I wonder why
> Steffen thinks rtax might have any influence on this test. The
> installed package did neither good nor bad for the test - it simply
> had the same result and rtax was not mentioned in any of the logs
> except in the form
>
> cogent/app/rtax.py
>
> ... but that's python-cogent and not rtax.
>
> Steffen, please be a bit more verbose about what you think might
> be helpful for a better qiime support.
>
I also contacted Steffen, as we also have soem users running qiime
1.7. maybe we can improve the package a bit.
Thank you again!
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=NHvV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: