[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ITK 4 and Python



On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 14:37 -0500, Paul Novotny wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 13:15 +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> > On 01/02/13 23:57, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > > On December 29, 2012 04:20:57 PM Paul Novotny wrote:
> > >> On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 10:26 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > >
> > >>> I haven't yet succeeded at getting the build stable, so help on that
> > >>> would be appreciated!
> > >
> > > By the way, I have updated the debian subversion repository [1] to the newest
> > > release ITK 4.3.1.  It builds on my x86 and amd64 machines but the upload is
> > > stuck in the NEW queue [2], so results for other architectures are not
> > > available yet.
> > 
> > Since I tried it on Gentoo, I know that 4.2.1 didn't build with python, 
> > but 4.3.0 did by using swig 2.0 and gccxml = 0.9.0_pre20120309.
> > It seems that 4.3.1 also does compile with python bindings (currently at 
> > 65%).
> > 
> > It is now also possible to use the system libtiff >= 4.0 (libtiff5-dev 
> > on Debian).
> 
> It might be worth turning back on a couple of the system libraries. HDF5
> might work now, bug #660547 appears to be fixed [1]. At the moment, a
> couple of the platforms don't compile because of the internal hdf5
> failing. I guess I could just try this out myself.
> 
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660547

Never mind, the hdf5 fix is still in experimental, hasn't made it to sid
yet. So the needed C++ bindings are still not available.

-Paul



Reply to: