Re: Help from Git-buildpackage experts wanted (Was: New upstream version of python-csb)
Le Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 09:32:21AM -0800, Diane Trout a écrit :
>
> I suspect that settings like export-dir or tarball-dir really shouldn't be in
> a repository. They seem specific to how you want to lay out your work
> directories.
Good point. How about the following:
Index: policy.xml
===================================================================
--- policy.xml (révision 12710)
+++ policy.xml (copie de travail)
@@ -306,6 +306,17 @@
<literal>debian/debianversion</literal> and upstream releases are
tagged with names like <literal>upstream/upstreamversion</literal>.
</para>
+ <para>
+ <command>git-buildpackage</command> can be set to a directory layout
+ similar to the one we use with <command>svn-buildpackage</command>.
+ This setting should use an user-wide or a system-wide
+ <filename>gbp.conf</filename> (not the one committed in the Git
+ repository.<programlisting>
+[git-buildpackage]
+# use this for more svn-buildpackage like behaviour:
+export-dir = ../build-area/
+tarball-dir = ../tarballs/</programlisting>
+ </para>
</sect3>
<sect3 id="git-without-tarball">
<title>Social Git</title>
--
Charles
Reply to: