comments on suggest line of med-bio-dev
Hello, sorry for being unequally distributed with my feedback. But at least here is some.
Taken from apt-cache show med-bio-dev:
Recommends: bioperl, libajax5-dev, libbio-mage-perl, libbio-ruby, libgenome-1.3-1,
libgo-perl, libncbi6-dev, libnucleus5-dev, libqsearch-dev, libvibrant6-dev, mcl,
python-biopython
The above I am fine with, not so with the suggestions:
Suggests: aceperl
should this possibly be "libace-perl" ?
bioclipse
fine
bioconductor
bioconductor should go
biomode
fine
libbio-das-perl
is this in the distribution? I cannot find it.
libbio-mage-utils-perl
there is however libbio-mage-perl
libbiojava-java
this should be under "Recommends", i.e. under the
same level as its ruby, python and perl fellas
libgff-perl, libmems-1.5-1, libtfbs-perl, limma
r-base-core
this is not a particular med-bio-dev package
and I would leave it aside but for general
statistics. I suggest to leave it aside.
seqan
is this in the distribution?
More greetings
Steffen (who should prepare the update for the just announced biojava 1.7 this week with
many nice changes to the structural bioinformatics world (which BioPerl is very sparse with))
Reply to: