Re: stats on the number of packages in various releases
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Steffen Moeller wrote:
though at list plink is missing here,
plink is in the list of recommends - what do you mean?
and so is infernal that is in experimental and such
Adding packages whi are in experimental exclusively should not
be added to the Recommends. They are decreased to Suggests.
BTW, if I run your script I get
Here the results of the counting:
oldstable : 34
stable : 47
testing : 51
unstable : 53
like autodocktools. Stable and testing should differ,
... and they differ. I have no idea what happened at your side.
at least for
med-bio-dev, a.g. for biojava.
See my other mail about biojava. As long as it is not in main it
can not be Recommended.
The script (checked in next to the paper-draft I want to use it for at
community/talks/200906_bosc) makes use of rmadison which comes with devscripts.
Suggestions for improvements are most welcome. For instance, it might be preferable to
somehow use the blend data directly, but I did not know how to do that.
I might consider moving it to blends-common. It is a nice tool.
Thanks for the input.