Re: stats on the number of packages in various releases
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Steffen Moeller wrote:
though at list plink is missing here,
plink is in the list of recommends - what do you mean?
and so is infernal that is in experimental and such
in non-free,
Adding packages whi are in experimental exclusively should not
be added to the Recommends. They are decreased to Suggests.
BTW, if I run your script I get
Here the results of the counting:
oldstable : 34
stable : 47
testing : 51
unstable : 53
like autodocktools. Stable and testing should differ,
... and they differ. I have no idea what happened at your side.
at least for
med-bio-dev, a.g. for biojava.
See my other mail about biojava. As long as it is not in main it
can not be Recommended.
The script (checked in next to the paper-draft I want to use it for at
community/talks/200906_bosc) makes use of rmadison which comes with devscripts.
Suggestions for improvements are most welcome. For instance, it might be preferable to
somehow use the blend data directly, but I did not know how to do that.
I might consider moving it to blends-common. It is a nice tool.
Thanks for the input.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: