Re: ODIN! (was: ODIN, anyone?)
- To: Debian Med Project List <debian-med@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: ODIN! (was: ODIN, anyone?)
- From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:42:48 +0100 (CET)
- Message-id: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903251436590.5408@wr-linux02>
- In-reply-to: <20090325131847.GA8839@localhost>
- References: <20090323144428.GA11842@balin.lan> <20090323192056.1a749338@pingu> <20090323211156.GA21129@runkel> <20090325090821.GB1715@localhost> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903251205480.5408@wr-linux02> <20090325112702.GA5536@localhost> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903251349570.5408@wr-linux02> <20090325131847.GA8839@localhost>
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Michael Hanke wrote:
The rule should be fine (for the gitweb installation on Alioth). if you
look at the first column of http://git.debian.org/ you get a long list
of examples ;-)
Hmmm, looking at the code again it *should* work this way even now.
I just have another look what might went wrong.
In general, however, it _could_ be a totally different association
between browser and checkout URL.
For this case the Vcs-Browser field can explicitely be set.
BTW, I noticed that we just had an odin entry in imaging-dev. I have
no idea wher it does fit better - just decide yourself and remove one
entry where it is not properly placed.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: