Re: [Bioperl-l] Are all recommended modules equally important ?
On Mar 17, 2008, at 11:38 AM, Dave Messina wrote:
Thanks for your note.
All of the BioPerl 'recommended' modules involve optional
I would think all of them would map to 'suggested' under Debian so
won't be installed by default.
I would probably elevate LWP to 'recommended.' Other than that I agree.
For everyone else, this is the list of recommended modules he's
Debian distributes versions 1.4 and 1.5.2 of Bioperl, but considers
using 1.5.2 in its next stable release. We welcome your comments
I think the consensus here would be that 1.5.2 is the appropriate
Bioperl to use in the next stable release of Debian. Although we've
to work toward Bioperl 1.6, that release will be at least a few
and 1.4, while technically our most recent 'stable' release, is
waaay out of
Bioperl-l mailing list
: Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at gmx dot net :