Il giorno Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:59:19 -0200 "Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)" <faw@debian.org> ha scritto: > On 15-12-2007 22:13, David Paleino wrote: > > Il giorno Sun, 16 Dec 2007 00:00:13 +0100 Martijn van Oosterhout ha scritto: > >> > >> [..] but fetching of any kind by a robot like this is wrong, no matter > >> what. > > > > Why not trying to solve the problem together then? > > We are trying to do that since the beginning. Martijn's reply sounded kinda hostile to me, but probably it's just because I'm a bit tired :(. No worries then :) > ... > As we told you before, your script parses the DDTSS interface Wrong, it doesn't. -.-'. Should I explain you again? The statistics are drawn by parsing Translation-<lang> files. Not DDTSS. Seems like we're speaking different languages here. And this makes me worried :'( > and that fetches files ...just not to have a "description not found" page. What I'm asking is just a "edit.cgi?package=<foo>" script which checks if the description must be fetched (and does it), otherwise points to the edit form. It doesn't seem that difficult :( > right now, DDTSS is under migration, there are quite a few things changing > and we couldn't reproduce the behavior, and we can't do that until i18n.d.n > got online next week. That's ok, I'll also have some more time on these Christmas holidays. > So, as I see it, we have a few things to check: > > ... > > 2) Debian-Med wishlist > > Bring the features Debian-Med wants to DDTP/DDTSS so we > can provide this service to other projects, like > Debian-Lex and Debian Science. In fact, my script wasn't intended to be Debian-Med's only. In general, we're a "prototype" of what other CDDs could use in the future. > As I said, we can work to provide that kind of list on > our side, some sort of "group package" feature, That shouldn't be a list; that would require a bit more work of just the "edit.cgi?..." I was mentioning before. > that could allow to see the statistics, using the DDTP backed in a much more > elegant way. The DDTSS was not designed to be used as a interface > to "summary tables", it can be expanded without doubt, but it > sounds much more interested to have "summary tables" merged in > our infrastructure. Sure. But this would be a future wishlist item IMHO; it's not desired by everyone (AFAICT, only Debian-Med is using such a feature right now. Would it deserve the effort of integrating it into DDTSS' infrastructure?) Have a nice day|night, David P.S.: I understand that in some sentences I might sound rude; please forgive me, it's 2.09 am here, and I'm not that able to rephrase my thoughts ;) -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://snipurl.com/qa_page : :' : Linuxer #334216 | http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://www.debianizzati.org/ `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature