Re: Can somebody sponsor dialign-t_0.2.2.dfsg-1 ?

[Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>]

On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Charles Plessy wrote:

> this is exactly why I disagree with those who make it mandatory to
> "clean" the upstream tarball from sourceless but otherwise free
> documentation.

I agree that you can use the same argument to support different
positions ...

> I have prepared a new version of dialign-t in which I rm-rf'ed the doc
> directory (I am pessimistic on the outcome of the discussion on -devel,
> which already digressed into an interesting debate about embedded
> fonts). The package is on mentors.d.n:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dialign-t/dialign-t_0.2.2.dfsg-1.dsc

Thanks.

> I did not get answer from upstream yet, and I do not want to become
> upstream instead of him. So I will not polish the tarball any further.
> For the html and PDF, I do not feel like replacing them. Neither writing
> a rule what generates the expurged tarball. My interest in dialign-t is
> to get DM-Coffee work, so I will keep focusing on this.

Fine.

Kind regards

         Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de