Re: LTS, no-dsa reasoning and sponsored packages

[Sylvain Beucler <beuc@beuc.net>]

Hi,

On 09/04/2019 09:50, Ingo Wichmann wrote:
> labeling it "minor issues" when the real reason is "sponsors needed"
> sounds wrong to me.

That's never been the real reason so far AFAICS, only a complementary
reason.

    [jessie] - libpodofo <ignored> (DoS, not used by any sponsor)
    [jessie] - hoteldruid <no-dsa> (low popcon, not used by any sponsor)
    [jessie] - hoteldruid <no-dsa> (low popcon, not used by any sponsor)
    [jessie] - hoteldruid <no-dsa> (low popcon, not used by any sponsor)
    [jessie] - hoteldruid <no-dsa> (low popcon, not used by any sponsor)
    [jessie] - tcpreplay <no-dsa> (not used by any sponsor, hard to exploit)
    [jessie] - tcpreplay <no-dsa> (not used by any sponsor, hard to exploit)
    [jessie] - edk2 <end-of-life> (non-free, not used by any sponsor)
    [jessie] - edk2 <end-of-life> (non-free, not used by any sponsor)
    [jessie] - edk2 <end-of-life> (non-free, not used by any sponsor)
    [jessie] - edk2 <end-of-life> (non-free is not supported, not used
by any sponsor)
    [jessie] - edk2 <end-of-life> (non-free is not supported, not used
by any sponsor)

Cheers!
Sylvain