hi, no need to cc: me, i'm subscribed to the lts list. On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 09:13:51AM +0200, Andrej Shadura wrote: > It is, but I guess the manual editing may be confusing for someone not > familiar with the workflow. And, possibly, the separation between "DLA > needed" and "claim a DLA". And the fact that the gen-DLA cannot just > generate a notification for an existing DLA number, only for a new one > (that led to the number increment in my case). And the fact that dla-needed is kind of a free flow text file, confused me as well. So I searched in wiki.d.o/LTS/Development for "claim" and sadly (by accident, see below) didnt start to search in the beginning of that page and then I found the entry where it describes how to claim a DLA, which I did, thinking this would be visible enough (and maybe automatically put an entry into dla-needed.txt.) Basically I wanted to reserve this DLA 'for me' because I had tested that the sid patch applied cleanly, but I was too tired (home from dc18 for a bit more than 24h..) to do the upload at that moment. And I was also too tired to remember that in fact I can just added dla-needed.txt as I want to, I don't have to wait for frontdesk to put a package there. Not sure how to easily improve the tooling here, as I have no idea how to programatically compare DLA/list and dla-needed.txt in a git hook in a meaningful way. -- cheers, Holger ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- holger@(debian|reproducible-builds).org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature