[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GUI Interactive Shell



>> yes!  one version back from latest upstream, but yes, it's there:

cheers, great news

>> you don't need the hook if you don't use sun java.  and installing eclipse will install openjdk because that is one of its dependencies.  so just add eclipse to your packages list and you should be fine.

even better. great!

>> you can just email 590049@bugs.debian.org expressing your interest in testing and asking for the status of the packaging effort.  that will get to the maintainer who is working on it.

will do so now. it would be great to have a .deb package. that's exactly what I am looking for...

will keep you posted on this... thanks Ben

bert


On 25 August 2010 20:36, Ben Armstrong <synrg@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca> wrote:
On 08/25/2010 03:31 PM, Robert Spiteri wrote:
>>why install eclipse? is the version in squeeze not suitable?

so eclipse is native in squeeze?

yes!  one version back from latest upstream, but yes, it's there:

>> same questions re java (in addition to openjdk6, there is also the non-free sun java if you absolutely must use that, and live-build even ships with an example hook to automatically accept the sun java license; see /usr/share/live/build/
examples/hooks/all_chroot_sun-java6.sh).

I would not like to include non-free packages so I would go about installing openjdk6 as long as it is compatible with the nxjc packages. Will check the hook in detail though

you don't need the hook if you don't use sun java.  and installing eclipse will install openjdk because that is one of its dependencies.  so just add eclipse to your packages list and you should be fine.


>>As for nxjc, I see this ITP (Intent To Package) for lejos-nxj has been filed.  Maybe this guy can help you if he has done something so far that is suitable for you to test?
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590049

worth giving it a try. thanks

you can just email 590049@bugs.debian.org expressing your interest in testing and asking for the status of the packaging effort.  that will get to the maintainer who is working on it.


>> It would be much easier for you if you could totally eliminate the need for the interactive step.  and you may already be closer to accomplishing that than you think.

so you think I can eliminate the interactive shell and manage everything through hooks? So i would need a hook for java (already mentioned) and another hook for nxjc right?

as i said, you don't need the hook for java if you use openjdk6.  and as for nxjc, so long as the maintainer has a .deb for you to try, you just need to put it in config/chroot_local-packages/ ... no hooks needed.

worst case scenario, you will need to do something else for nxjc because the package isn't ready yet, but let's cross that bridge when we get to it (i thought most java software was shipped in .zip archives that you could just unzip and point CLASSPATH at; is this no longer the case? *must* you always use gui installers?)

Ben




--
Robert
http://www.weavefx.com

Reply to: