On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:27:51PM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:09:36PM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
> > available in binary form only. In this case You should use binary
> > kernel from redhat or suse. Yes, even in this case You can take
> > appropriate kernel source and compile kernel modules, but this is
> > addition work.
> I don't know, may be redhat like debian have squashfs modules in
> separate package.
They don't. Squashfs and unionfs are only supported by third parties;
in fact, I still have not managed to get CentOS 4 to support squashfs.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-live-devel/attachments/20070613/9ab4c4fb/attachment.pgp