[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Many bug fixes, more tests, and unimplemented tags



Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 01:12 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> 
> [unimplemented tags]
> 
> fwiw, and because I was curious... These all /were/ implemented, but
> were subsequently disabled or removed. A quick trawl of the changelog
> gives:

Yeah, I expected that. Actually, in the mbox I submitted in the original
email there's the following commit:

commit 61a84ad52efb2f95956b6cea4462eae4c42946b6
Author: Raphael Geissert <atomo64@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon Apr 13 02:43:19 2009 -0500

    Remove the remainings of the policy cgi-lib failure

diff --git a/checks/files.desc b/checks/files.desc
index c1ae623..6d3d8dd 100644
--- a/checks/files.desc
+++ b/checks/files.desc
@@ -790,16 +790,6 @@ Info: The package contains a .desktop file in an
obsolete directory.
  that are intended to create a menu should be placed in
  <tt>/usr/share/applications</tt>, not <tt>/usr/share/gnome/apps</tt>.

-Tag: file-in-usr-lib-cgi-bin
-Severity: normal
-Certainty: certain
-Info: Packages shipping web server CGI files should install them in
- <tt>/usr/lib/cgi-lib</tt>, not in <tt>/usr/lib/cgi-bin</tt>.  This is
- done to avoid conflicts with the cgi-bin script alias, which is reserved
- for the local use of webmasters.  Web servers should include /cgi-lib/ as
- a standard ScriptAlias pointing to that directory.
-Ref: policy 11.5

> 
>> t/scripts/implemented-tags....ok 1/32
>> #   Unimplemented tag 'no-manpage-in-correct-directory' detected
>> #   at /home/raphael/Deb/lintian/checks/manpages.desc
> 
> lintian (1.23.1) unstable; urgency=low
> [...]
>   * checks/manpages:
>     + [FL] Comment check for no-manpage-in-correct-directory out until
>       I know if it's worth keeping it at all (Closes: #253011)
>       Thanks to Stephen Stafford for pointing this out.
> [...]
>  -- Debian Lintian Maintainers
>  <lintian-maint@debian.org>  Tue, 13 Jul 2004
>  01:23:20 +0200
> 
> It was (mostly :) removed in 088129c0b4968753957b626ea4e622795e5d271b a
> couple of years ago, although the log entry only refers to checks/files.
> 

"mostly" heh

>> t/scripts/implemented-tags....ok 13/32
>> #   Unimplemented tag 'possible-name-space-pollution' detected
>> #   at /home/raphael/Deb/lintian/checks/files.desc
> 
> lintian (0.4.0) unstable; urgency=low
> [...]
>  * Fixed `files' check:
>     - disabled possible-name-space-pollution tag since policy is not
>       defined yet
> [...]
>  -- Christian Schwarz <schwarz@debian.org> 
>  Mon,  6 Apr 1998 21:58:42 +0200
> 
>> t/scripts/implemented-tags....NOK 2/32
>> #   Unimplemented tag 'menu-item-adds-to-root-menu' detected
>> #   at /home/raphael/Deb/lintian/checks/menu-format.desc
> 
> The removal of this tag isn't mentioned explicitly, but a little digging
> finds that it was removed in 1850c8f7793d9f4430be6344fe84f9629e06d3ab as
> part of a clear up of the "needs" checks, released in Lintian 1.2.11 in
> February 2004.
> 

Cheers,
-- 
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net



Reply to: