Bug#476417: Bug#495431: Bogus missing-dep-for-interpreter errors with ocamlrun
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org> writes:
> Taking a look at the archive the change seems to make sense, but I still
> wonder what Russ was looking at when he claimed in 476417 "The packages
> that depend on OCaml aren't using the versioned virtual packages now,".
I tried to do a search at the time to figure out what was going on and
that was the result that I got at the time, but it's entirely possible
that I botched the search.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: