Bug#476417: Bug#495431: Bogus missing-dep-for-interpreter errors with ocamlrun

[Stéphane Glondu <steph@glondu.net>]

Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Yeah, but in spirit. So it might actually make more sense code
> history wise to revert that commit and then adapt it to be version
> agnostic.

This is fine to me. As long as the version is not hardcoded as it was.

> Taking a look at the archive the change seems to make sense, but I
> still wonder what Russ was looking at when he claimed in 476417
> "The packages that depend on OCaml aren't using the versioned
> virtual packages now,".

Maybe he was looking at source packages...? Besides, as I said, the
ongoing OCaml transition must have added some fuzz in the mess.


Cheers,

-- 
Stéphane Glondu