Bug#476417: Bug#495431: Bogus missing-dep-for-interpreter errors with ocamlrun
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 08:47:40PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld wrote (in #495431):
> > Hmm, isn't that like a reversal of d1a22f3e1a9503f401e517dcf38ebe44c3d4cce3 ?
> > [...]
>
> Not exactly...
Yeah, but in spirit. So it might actually make more sense code
history wise to revert that commit and then adapt it to be version
agnostic.
Taking a look at the archive the change seems to make sense, but I
still wonder what Russ was looking at when he claimed in 476417
"The packages that depend on OCaml aren't using the versioned
virtual packages now,".
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Reply to: