Processed: setting package to lintian, tagging 485954, tagging 495836
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> # via tagpending
> #
> # lintian (2.0.0~rc1) experimental; urgency=low
> #
> # * checks/menus{,.desc}:
> # + [FL] Do not complain if the unknown doc-base section is the subsection
> # of a known section. The doc-base documentation seems to suggest that
> # this is o.k. (Closes: #495836)
> # + [FL] Issue a special tag if the doc-base section would be valid except
> # for a prefixed App(lication)s.
> # * checks/scripts:
> # + [FL] Change all regular expressions in depends_needed to
> # require spaces after the command and not \b. There are
> # very few cases where this would produce false negatives
> # but there are reported false positives for the current
> # expressions.
> # + [RA] Improve the check for possibly insecure /tmp files to check
> # variable assignment as well and reduce false positives by ignoring
> # uses with $RANDOM or without a filename. Based on a patch from
> # Raphael Geissert.
> # + [FL] Update lists of available interpreter versions (remove: jruby1.1,
> # pike7.7, php4, octave2.9, add: tcl8.6, tk8.6). (Closes: #485954)
> #
> package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
> tags 485954 + pending
Bug#485954: Please warn about scripts with a php4 shebang
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 495836 + pending
Bug#495836: lintian: should not complaining about doc-base section Programming/*
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Reply to: