Re: Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant
* On 4/20/20 10:48 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> For sure it fails the Dissident Test.
> Does it? The part which requires the availability of the source changes explicitly
> talks about deployment of the software, i.e. distribution, not personal use which
> would be the criteria for the dissident test.
> If I'm using the software for myself and modify it, I'm free to keep the modifications
> to myself unless I distribute the software, so I don't think the clause would fail
> the test.
Yes, but the Dissident Test explicitly includes distribution to friends.