> > > > > > - 3. You may not have any income from distributing this source > > > > > > - (or altered version of it) to other developers. When You > > > > > > - use this product in a comercial package, the source may > > > > > > - not be charged seperatly. > > > > > > > > But a developer doesn't have the freedom to sell the software for > > > > profit to other developers. > > > as suggested in the original question, this clause is similar to clause 1 of > > > the SIL Open Font License 1.1, which is DFSG-Free. > > The second sentence is similar to the Open Font License, but I was > > talking about the first sentence. > The two sentences can not be dissociated: the second sentence gives as much > freedom as in the SIL OFL 1.1, regardless of the restrictions in the first > sentence, so altogether, the clause 3 quoted above is DFSG-Free, if we agree > that the SIL OFL 1.1 itself is DFSG-Free. The second sentence is restricted by the first sentence. Within the meaning of the license, a commercial package does not include source sold to other developers.
Description: PGP signature