On Sat, 30 May 2015 10:46:04 +0900 Charles Plessy <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > Le Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:26:59AM +1000, Riley Baird a écrit : > > > > - 3. You may not have any income from distributing this source > > > > - (or altered version of it) to other developers. When You > > > > - use this product in a comercial package, the source may > > > > - not be charged seperatly. > > > > > > This clause is really annoying, but it seems to allow the file to be > > > sold as part of a commercial package. Hence, it could perhaps be > > > considered to meet DFSG#1. > > > > But a developer doesn't have the freedom to sell the software for > > profit to other developers. > > as suggested in the original question, this clause is similar to clause 1 of > the SIL Open Font License 1.1, which is DFSG-Free. > > > Neither the Font Software nor any of its individual components, in Original > > or Modified Versions, may be sold by itself. The second sentence is similar to the Open Font License, but I was talking about the first sentence. > Have a nice week-end, You too!
Description: PGP signature