Quoting Paul Tagliamonte (2014-05-21 18:12:11) > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 06:06:38PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> I can't figure out exactly what your previous concerns were but it's >>> good to hear that they're resolved. >> >> For the record, my concern was not the AGPL (I am a fan of that too, >> and will most likely use it for my packaging work when Debian ships >> it in common-licenses). Rather, the licensing text itself forbids >> editing, and previous revisions had the exceptions placed within the >> common AGPL license - now it is properly placed before the common >> license. > > It's not a change to the AGPL text, it's an Additional permission, as > defined by the (A)GPL. I see no issues, myself. In fact, it looks to > clarify an issue (by rounding down, not adding further restrictions) > that some consider to be problematic. > > Also, for clarity's sake, the AGPL text wasn't changed, the LICENSE > file contains more than just the license. At least, that's what I > guess by glancing at this file for a few seconds. I could be wrong. Did those few seconds involve looking at the URL I rerferenced - specifically the location of the no-communication exception _before_ that commit (i.e. around lines 408-413)? https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin/commit/a57bf36 I agree that _after_ that commit there is no problem - which is my reason to write as I did initially in this thread. Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature