On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:44:20 -0300 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On Tue 12 Mar 2013 05:57:42 Martin Steigerwald escribió: > [snip] > > Well accoding to the compabitily page GPL 3 will work, as long as there is > > no GPL 2 only software involved. Thus well I double check the ruby termios > > license. If its really GPL 2+, GPL 3+ seems fine to me. > > > > Any other oppinions? > > Dual licensing, maybe? Both GPL 2+ and 3+. Well, this would be perfectly equivalent to GPL-2+, as far as I can tell... -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpBWzTiNXHnT.pgp
Description: PGP signature