[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions.

Le Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 03:52:40PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> | 
> | There is no such thing as “putting a work in the public domain”, you
> | America-centered, Commonwealth-biased individual. Public domain varies
> | with the jurisdictions, and it is in some places debatable whether
> | someone who has not been dead for the last seventy years is entitled to
> | put his own work in the public domain.
> (Sources for last two quotes: http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/)
> Replacing “Public Domain” by “Public Domain” (which to me is what BOLA
> is about) sounds hmmm broken?

I can re-release under the BOLA license with a WTFPL exemption:

‘To all effects and purposes, this work is to be considered Public Domain, but
if you do not agree this is possible, then just DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO.’

This said, license proliferation is not Buena Onda…


Reply to: