debian-legal Jul 2009 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions.
Charles Plessy
Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions.
Francesco Poli
Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions.
Charles Plessy
Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions.
Cyril Brulebois
Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions.
Charles Plessy
Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions.
Francesco Poli
Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions.
Charles Plessy
Does the ISC license require to reproduce copyrights in debian/copyright ?
Charles Plessy
Re: Does the ISC license require to reproduce copyrights in debian/copyright ?
Francesco Poli
Re: Does the ISC license require to reproduce copyrights in debian/copyright ?
Ben Finney
Re: Does the ISC license require to reproduce copyrights in debian/copyright ?
Charles Plessy
Re: Does the ISC license require to reproduce copyrights in debian/copyright ?
Francesco Poli
Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions.
MJ Ray
Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions.
Charles Plessy
Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions.
Florian Weimer
Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions.
Charles Plessy
Mono License changes over time and the risks this is presenting.
Peter Dolding
Re: Mono License changes over time and the risks this is presenting.
Michael Poole
Re: Mono License changes over time and the risks this is presenting.
MJ Ray
Re: Mono License changes over time and the risks this is presenting.
Peter Dolding
Re: Mono License changes over time and the risks this is presenting.
Matthew Johnson
Re: Mono License changes over time and the risks this is presenting.
Don Armstrong
Iceweasel trademark
Daniel Richard G.
Re: Iceweasel trademark
Sven Joachim
Re: Iceweasel trademark
Daniel Richard G.
Re: Iceweasel trademark
Paul Wise
"re" module and old Python 1.6 (GPL incompatible) license?
Anderson Lizardo
Re: "re" module and old Python 1.6 (GPL incompatible) license?
Florian Weimer
Re: "re" module and old Python 1.6 (GPL incompatible) license?
Bernhard R. Link
Verifying licence for packaging
Michael Gvirtzman
Re: Verifying licence for packaging
Jeff Epler
Re: Verifying licence for packaging
Ben Finney
Re: Verifying licence for packaging
Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Re: Verifying licence for packaging
Charles Plessy
Re: Verifying licence for packaging
Rippit the Ogg Frog
Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers
Matthias Klose
Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers
Florian Weimer
Licensing of Doxygen output
Jonathan Nieder
The last update was on 16:44 GMT Mon May 18. There are 39 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc