debian-legal Jul 2009 by date

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Jul 01

License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions. Charles Plessy
Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions. Francesco Poli

Jul 02

Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions. Charles Plessy
Does the ISC license require to reproduce copyrights in debian/copyright ? Charles Plessy
Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions. Cyril Brulebois
Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions. Charles Plessy

Jul 03

Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions. MJ Ray
Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions. Charles Plessy
Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions. Francesco Poli
Re: Does the ISC license require to reproduce copyrights in debian/copyright ? Francesco Poli
Re: Does the ISC license require to reproduce copyrights in debian/copyright ? Ben Finney

Jul 04

Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions. Charles Plessy
Re: Does the ISC license require to reproduce copyrights in debian/copyright ? Charles Plessy
Re: Does the ISC license require to reproduce copyrights in debian/copyright ? Francesco Poli

Jul 05

Mono License changes over time and the risks this is presenting. Peter Dolding
Re: Mono License changes over time and the risks this is presenting. Michael Poole

Jul 06

Re: Mono License changes over time and the risks this is presenting. MJ Ray
Re: Mono License changes over time and the risks this is presenting. Peter Dolding
Re: Mono License changes over time and the risks this is presenting. Matthew Johnson
Re: Mono License changes over time and the risks this is presenting. Don Armstrong

Jul 07

Iceweasel trademark Daniel Richard G.
Re: Iceweasel trademark Sven Joachim
Re: Iceweasel trademark Paul Wise
"re" module and old Python 1.6 (GPL incompatible) license? Anderson Lizardo
Re: Iceweasel trademark Daniel Richard G.

Jul 08

Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions. Florian Weimer
Re: License requiring to reproduce copyrights in binary distributions. Charles Plessy

Jul 12

Re: "re" module and old Python 1.6 (GPL incompatible) license? Florian Weimer

Jul 14

Re: "re" module and old Python 1.6 (GPL incompatible) license? Bernhard R. Link

Jul 19

Verifying licence for packaging Michael Gvirtzman

Jul 20

Re: Verifying licence for packaging Jeff Epler
Re: Verifying licence for packaging Charles Plessy
Re: Verifying licence for packaging Ben Finney
Re: Verifying licence for packaging Rippit the Ogg Frog
Re: Verifying licence for packaging Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers Matthias Klose

Jul 21

Delivery Failure Report: Attachment Blocked Infoservices
Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers Kalle Olavi Niemitalo

Jul 22

Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers Florian Weimer

Jul 30

Licensing of Doxygen output Jonathan Nieder

The last update was on 06:18 GMT Sun Oct 04. There are 40 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc