Re: ok for Redland to link against openssl?
* Jonas Smedegaard:
> I filed bug#488766 some months ago with no response from maintainer.
>
> Could I please have some more eyeballs on that: Am I right that Redland
> violates GPL?
>
> Or is it ok since Redland is dual-licensed, so it should simply always
> be considered as Apache licensed when used with Debian?
It's licensed under the LGPL 2.1 with the "or any newer version" clause.
The LGPL 2.1 is compatible with the OpenSSL license. However,
applications using Redland may use licenses which are not compatible.
Reply to: