ok for Redland to link against openssl?

[Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I filed bug#488766 some months ago with no response from maintainer.

Could I please have some more eyeballs on that: Am I right that Redland 
violates GPL?

Or is it ok since Redland is dual-licensed, so it should simply always 
be considered as Apache licensed when used with Debian?

Currently morla (ITP bug#431824) cannot be packaged as it is GPL. Should 
I convince upstream to dual-license, or convince Redland maintainer to 
extend with a GPL-compatible package non-postgres package?


What do you think?


   Jonas

P.S.

Please cc me on responses, as I am not subscribed to the list.

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAki9LsYACgkQn7DbMsAkQLgVogCglsvH3hRQ+OdBr1jaSz/KSkRU
iQIAn3IsDtsC7u4gdy/JBt3/9LF3TsYj
=0Dew
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----