Re: Is AGPLv3 DFSG-free?
2008/9/3 Gervase Markham <email@example.com>:
> Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>> Would you consider that anonymous enough to pass the dissident test?
> The dissident test does not require that every possible method of source
> distribution passes the test, but only that it's possible to pass the test.
I know. The point is that there must be some way to satisfy
simultaneously all the DFSG to consider a license free. The idea to
use a free web repository for the code was so that the
non-discrimination of user groups -because of the increase in cost-
was guaranteed. We seem to be exchanging that with the
non-availability for use in any case, as in the case of a dissident. I
was just stating that.