On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:07:40 -0500 Joe Smith wrote: [...] > Well it is no less free than the MPL. IMO, the MPL does *not* meet the DFSG. Some other debian-legal contributors share this opinion: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/06/msg00221.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/03/msg00551.html On the other hand, other people think the MPL is acceptable for main: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/07/msg00197.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/07/msg00215.html Standardized disclaimers: IANAL, TINLA, IANADD, TINASOTODP. -- http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/refresh-pubring.html New! Version 0.6 available! What? See for yourself! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpKnOGuNasU5.pgp
Description: PGP signature