Re: help with crafting proper license header for a dual-licensing project

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: help with crafting proper license header for a dual-licensing project
From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 10:52:16 +0530
Message-id: <46494388.1060602@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <87zm4k9mdu.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
References: <4636A510.20300@gmail.com> <87zm4k9mdu.fsf@benfinney.id.au>

As many people have pointed out, I realize I should be saying"proprietary" when I used the word "commercial". I also realize that theGPL does not preclude "commercial" == "for profit" usage. I was merelyechoing the terminology used by Trolltech. I do not condone it however.


Thanks as always for all your feedback.

Shriramana Sharma.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: help with crafting proper license header for a dual-licensing project
  - From: Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au>
- Re: help with crafting proper license header for a dual-licensing project
  - From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@gmail.com>
- Re: help with crafting proper license header for a dual-licensing project
  - From: "Anthony W. Youngman" <debian@thewolery.demon.co.uk>

References:
- help with crafting proper license header for a dual-licensing project
  - From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@gmail.com>
- Re: help with crafting proper license header for a dual-licensing project
  - From: Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Re: Gmail (was: Dual licensing)
Next by Date: Remakes of older games
Previous by thread: Re: help with crafting proper license header for a dual-licensing project
Next by thread: Re: help with crafting proper license header for a dual-licensing project
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread