Re: Sun Java available from non-free
On 6/4/06, Steve Langasek <email@example.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 12:18:16PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 6/4/06, Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 12:18:39AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> >> Too many excuses. All inadequate.
> >> It is past time that the covert actions of the "small cabal"
> >> were openly reviewed. The license (for convenience), any
> >> relevant written promises from Sun (if any), and any relevant
> >> written legal opinions from counsel (if any) should forthwith
> >> be posted to debian-legal.
> >For those playing along at home, Mike isn't a Debian developer, doesn't
> >maintain any packages, and isn't a new-maintainer applicant. He doesn't
> >even seem to be a regular participant on the debian-legal list.
> None of those things seem to be relevant.
For those still playing, Olaf also isn't a Debian developer, doesn't
maintain any packages, and isn't a new-maintainer applicant. He's made
something like 5 posts to debian-legal, though, which I guess given Andrew
Donnellan's assertion that someone with one post ever on -legal is a
"regular participant", means Olaf is a senior analyst or something.
I guess the conclusion is that being a Debian developer means you're
right and not being one means you're wrong?